Charge: A primary goal of Data Management Committee (DMC) initiatives is to facilitate Recommendation 1.2 of the Administrative Systems Master Plan: “Improve Design and Management of Data to Enhance Decision-Making.” More specifically, the DMC’s objectives are established in accordance with the principles set forth in the Data Management Standards (see memo, Provost and CFO; May 1, 2013). On behalf of the DMC, working groups have been formed to identify and mitigate specific areas of risks associated with access, storage, and distribution of UT Austin’s data assets. The Data Management Standards will serve as the primary guide for the activities of the working groups.
Members: Trice Humpert, Maryrose Hightower-Coyle, Rich Janes, Eda Matthews, Tracy Brown, Kristi Fisher (ex officio)
Scope of Work: The Storage, Retention, and Transition Workgroup is charged with identifying and evaluating risks and mitigation strategies associated with redundant data storage, records retention, and data transition and archival planning, including:
- Data growth and retention
- Access to archived data
- Data consistency and integrity
- Data storage options
- Retention of data subject to Open Records requests
- Other risk areas identified by the workgroup
Possible mitigation strategies may include the use or development of:
- Processes for review/approval of transition plans
- Records Retention policy review
- Centralized data resources, such as IDS
- Training or guidebook
- Other strategies proposed by the group
At appropriate intervals, the group will report their work and/or findings to the full DMC and make recommendations for implementing mitigation strategies.
A prior working group developed an initial list of risks relevant to the access, store, and distribution of institutional data. That list will serve as a basis for the working groups initial discussions, but it is anticipated that the group will identify additional risks. The risks identified by this group may overlap with the subject matter of other DMC workgroups; in those cases, the workgroups are expected to coordinate their work and to determine more broad-based and efficient solutions.
The workgroup should review all existing policies and procedures around their risk area in order to avoid duplication of effort or time spent discussing strategies that are already in place. The group is also expected to engage additional personnel, as needed, to provide expertise and input to their discussions (ex: legal affairs, ISO, compliance, data stewards). In addition, the group should be mindful of whether the risks identified are within the purview of the DMC, meaning the issues and strategies are actionable by DMC as they relate to institutional data assets. (For instance, in instances where physical data security is an issue, the risks and mitigation strategies may already fall within the purview of ISO.)